It looks like this podcast has ended some time ago. This means that no new episodes have been added some time ago. If you're the host of this podcast, you can check whether your RSS file is reachable for podcast clients.
Dissenting Opinions
by Will BaudeWelcome to Dissenting Opinions, a new podcast by the Constitutional Law Institute at the University of Chicago Law School. Hosted by Will Baude, each episode will have top legal minds discuss a Supreme Court case they believe is misunderstood -- with special episodes of a "deep dive" into a legal topic.
Copyright: UChicago Constitutional Law Institute 2021
Episodes
That Other Original Sin
45m · PublishedWill is joined by New York University law professor Maggie Blackhawk to discuss federal Indian law and cases including Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta and the upcoming case Brackeen v. Haaland. Will and Maggie discuss the legacy of colonialism and the Constitution, the separation of powers in Indian Country, and the government's broader constitutional duties. They then discuss the history of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) and what we might see happen regarding ICWA this fall. Happy Constitution Day!
Finale
25m · PublishedLife of the Body
35m · PublishedLife of the Mind
36m · PublishedLiberation Isn't a Zero-Sum Game
29m · PublishedTaking The Easy Way Out
24m · PublishedWe're Actually in a Haunted House
31m · PublishedCritical Race Theory is a Verb
26m · PublishedChecks and Balances (with Curt Bradley)
49m · PublishedIn our final episode of Season 1, Will is joined by the newest UChicago Law professor, Curt Bradley, to discuss INS v. Chadha a transformative case that invalidated the "legislative" veto almost forty years ago. They discuss the formal and functional separation of powers, and the surprising possibility that it wasn't really so transformative after all. This episode also features a look at the scholarship of then-Senator Joseph Biden. Happy Constitution Day!
Case audio is from Oyez.org
Fractured Opinions (with Nina Varsava)
50m · PublishedWill is joined by University of Wisconsin law professor Nina Varsava, where they discuss how to make sense of fractured Supreme Court opinions in light of Marks v. United States. They also discuss the applications of Marks's "narrowest grounds" test in the recent jury-trial decision of Ramos v. Louisiana, with plenty of Dworkin along the way. Later in the episode they dig into Nina's infamous paper on judicial rhetoric.
Case audio from Oyez.org
Dissenting Opinions has 24 episodes in total of non- explicit content. Total playtime is 16:01:52. The language of the podcast is English. This podcast has been added on November 22nd 2022. It might contain more episodes than the ones shown here. It was last updated on February 23rd, 2024 09:43.