Divorce Matters

Today we will show you how to legally complain and remove a judge. The system has made it difficult, but Angel breaks down how to do it properly.  

Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1

Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to KidsMatter.charity 

https://kidsmatter.charity/campaigns/kids-matter-donate/donate/

Transcript: 

We have a returning guest Angel law. That's a pseudonym because she's so mixed up in so many cases. But she's here to explain something that I have a lot of interest in. And I'm sure a lot of you will, and that is how to properly complain and get your judges or attorneys in trouble for violating your rights or the law, or the million other things that they do so with that. Angel, let's talk about what it is that you've done and what you've figured out and what a lot of people don't know just an overview.
Right. So what has recently happened was, I was a unique case, where I was able to remove a judge from my own matter by filing a motion to disqualify the judge based upon the judges. very terrible conduct. And this is the most difficult way to remove a judge. And it's fraught with obstacles, and it's something you wouldn't want to do. But in the course of figuring that out. Prior to asking the judge to remove himself because of his misconduct, I can first started off with making a complaint to the presiding judge of my courthouse. And this is really important because you can usually obtain a form by contacting the clerk of your court. And there's an official form that you can even fill out in handwriting. It's about two pages long so special complaint to the presiding judge and you send it in. The presiding judge has 30 days to respond, and they must respond within 30 days. Notice it's something I was looking for be a wonderful tool for all of us if we flood the court. And we drive the presiding judges into having an answer for the accordance conduct of their subordinate judges. We could maybe let them know hey, we know that you guys aren't supposed to be doing this. And Mr. Presiding or Mrs. Presiding Judge. You have an administrative and supervision advisory duty to do something about that. And maybe at least it's you know, just because they're they don't want to do the work. They might say to their subordinate judges. Hey, knock this off. I've got too many complaints to respond to so step number one, when you got to an awful judge is preparing to remove them with either a one or a coordinated effort where you're going to complain to the presiding and then you're going to complain to the BJP. But you don't want to complain.
You thought though, I would just interject that doing it. This way to remove the judges is a lot harder than just go into 171 one 70.11 7.3 Or one 70.6 If you haven't recused anyone yet, right?
And I, you know, in my experience, when I read the California Code of Civil Procedure, and this is not legal advice, this is my personal experience. I had a conversation with an appellate attorney, and a one 70.6 is a peremptory challenge. That means within 10 days of being appointed, a new judge, like your case is assigned to a new judicial officer. You're supposed to have 10 days and you left to complete your motion to challenge that judge and have an offense. Basically,

Tim Schilling, parental rights advocate in Pennsylvania. I started my horrifying nightmare in December of 2013. And just like everybody else around the United States, I filed for divorce, custody, equable distribution, and during this time, I went through nine different attorneys.

I lost everything I was homeless. I was parentally alienated from my daughter for about three and a half, maybe four years. And they was just attacking me from every which side I was in nine different cases and

 A reminder that we are not attorneys. And this is not legal advice.

However, we will help you more than any attorney ever will.

And now here's your hosts, Michael Alexander and Mark Fidelman.

Hello, everyone, welcome to divorce matters. Oh my god, you know who's back? Michael Alexander. I can't believe it. He's finally decided to come out of this retirement and do another show.
And his name is on the freakin headline. So I'm glad to have you back. Michael. We have a very special show today. A lot of you are going to want to hear this. It is about recusing a judge we have found another tactic. Again, I want to say only recuse bad judges, you can't be using this to recuse somebody that's ruling fairly that you don't like because you're the problem has to be a bad judge that does bad things. So with that said,
Michael, welcome back to the show. Thank you. Pleasure to not see you again.
And we also have a special guest. We're gonna call her Angel law today because we don't want her to be inundated with requests for her to help you. She's not an attorney, she is in an attorney's firm, same one that I'm associated with, but neither one of us are attorney. So this isn't legal advice. We're just going to talk about her case. And,
well, Angel, why don't you introduce yourself real quick. Thank you so much for the very warm introduction. I am a litigant, a survivor of victim and now warrior of the family court system. So I am no different than every person listening to my voice right now. I am in your shoes, I was in your shoes, you might be somewhere different on the journey. I am a proud mother of three wonderful children. And we have endured nine years of a an amoral court system. I've seen the worst of the worst in my case and in many others. And I feel joyful and privileged to be here today to give some good news. I guess I could describe myself as the court Houdini, but I am still inside of there nine years later without ever having had a trial. All that being said, I have successfully removed a 730 custody evaluator for my case, I have successfully removed a therapist, I have successfully removed a parenting plan coordinator and all the other cottage industry charlatans. Perhaps my golden star came when a corrupt bag of puke minors counsel was appointed to my case over my objection. And the miners Council refused to take the case because of my name being involved. And all of this culminated to the final removal of a very, very, very bad judge. So without further ado, that's kind of my resume. My experience of the Family Court. All right, so let me summarize. Summarize it real quick. You haven't had a trial, it's been nine years, you've had a lot of bad actors, which we all know, are part of the system to extract as much money out of you as possible. It's not going to be in everyone's case. But I think the majority of cases I've seen, this is what's going on, you figure out how to remove all of them. You had one thorn in your side, which was a bad judge, how long was that bad judge part of your case? Well, Mark, it's really good and important question.
My matter had been in front of one very corrupt judge for eight years, I did not know how to get rid of him. And the one 170.1 motion that I'm about to describe that I used with the new judge would not have worked once I had a judge on for many years, but we'll touch upon alternate

Sponsored by Kids Matter www.kidsmatter.charity donate to give kids a voice in divorce 

Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1

Contact Michael at www.judicialrevolution.u

 A reminder that we are not attorneys. And this is not legal advice.

However, we will help you more than any attorney ever will.

And now here's your hosts, Michael Alexander and Mark Fidelman.

Hello, everyone, welcome to divorce matters. Oh my god, you know who's back? Michael Alexander. I can't believe it. He's finally decided to come out of this retirement and do another show.
And his name is on the freakin headline. So I'm glad to have you back. Michael. We have a very special show today. A lot of you are going to want to hear this. It is about recusing a judge we have found another tactic. Again, I want to say only recuse bad judges, you can't be using this to recuse somebody that's ruling fairly that you don't like because you're the problem has to be a bad judge that does bad things. So with that said,
Michael, welcome back to the show. Thank you. Pleasure to not see you again.
And we also have a special guest. We're gonna call her Angel law today because we don't want her to be inundated with requests for her to help you. She's not an attorney, she is in an attorney's firm, same one that I'm associated with, but neither one of us are attorney. So this isn't legal advice. We're just going to talk about her case. And,
well, Angel, why don't you introduce yourself real quick. Thank you so much for the very warm introduction. I am a litigant, a survivor of victim and now warrior of the family court system. So I am no different than every person listening to my voice right now. I am in your shoes, I was in your shoes, you might be somewhere different on the journey. I am a proud mother of three wonderful children. And we have endured nine years of a an amoral court system. I've seen the worst of the worst in my case and in many others. And I feel joyful and privileged to be here today to give some good news. I guess I could describe myself as the court Houdini, but I am still inside of there nine years later without ever having had a trial. All that being said, I have successfully removed a 730 custody evaluator for my case, I have successfully removed a therapist, I have successfully removed a parenting plan coordinator and all the other cottage industry charlatans. Perhaps my golden star came when a corrupt bag of puke minors counsel was appointed to my case over my objection. And the miners Council refused to take the case because of my name being involved. And all of this culminated to the final removal of a very, very, very bad judge. So without further ado, that's kind of my resume. My experience of the Family Court. All right, so let me summarize. Summarize it real quick. You haven't had a trial, it's been nine years, you've had a lot of bad actors, which we all know, are part of the system to extract as much money out of you as possible. It's not going to be in everyone's case. But I think the majority of cases I've seen, this is what's going on, you figure out how to remove all of them. You had one thorn in your side, which was a bad judge, how long was that bad judge part of your case? Well, Mark, it's really good and important question.
My matter had been in front of one very corrupt judge for eight years, I did not know how to get rid of him. And the one 170.1 motion that I'm about to describe that I used with the new judge would not have worked once I had a judge on for many years, but we'll touch upon alternate

Sponsored by Kids Matter www.kidsmatter.charity donate to give kids a voice in divorce 

Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1

Contact Michael at www.judicialrevolution.u

 A reminder that we are not attorneys. And this is not legal advice.

However, we will help you more than any attorney ever will.

And now here's your hosts, Michael Alexander and Mark Fidelman.

Hello, everyone, welcome to divorce matters. Oh my god, you know who's back? Michael Alexander. I can't believe it. He's finally decided to come out of this retirement and do another show.
And his name is on the freakin headline. So I'm glad to have you back. Michael. We have a very special show today. A lot of you are going to want to hear this. It is about recusing a judge we have found another tactic. Again, I want to say only recuse bad judges, you can't be using this to recuse somebody that's ruling fairly that you don't like because you're the problem has to be a bad judge that does bad things. So with that said,
Michael, welcome back to the show. Thank you. Pleasure to not see you again.
And we also have a special guest. We're gonna call her Angel law today because we don't want her to be inundated with requests for her to help you. She's not an attorney, she is in an attorney's firm, same one that I'm associated with, but neither one of us are attorney. So this isn't legal advice. We're just going to talk about her case. And,
well, Angel, why don't you introduce yourself real quick. Thank you so much for the very warm introduction. I am a litigant, a survivor of victim and now warrior of the family court system. So I am no different than every person listening to my voice right now. I am in your shoes, I was in your shoes, you might be somewhere different on the journey. I am a proud mother of three wonderful children. And we have endured nine years of a an amoral court system. I've seen the worst of the worst in my case and in many others. And I feel joyful and privileged to be here today to give some good news. I guess I could describe myself as the court Houdini, but I am still inside of there nine years later without ever having had a trial. All that being said, I have successfully removed a 730 custody evaluator for my case, I have successfully removed a therapist, I have successfully removed a parenting plan coordinator and all the other cottage industry charlatans. Perhaps my golden star came when a corrupt bag of puke minors counsel was appointed to my case over my objection. And the miners Council refused to take the case because of my name being involved. And all of this culminated to the final removal of a very, very, very bad judge. So without further ado, that's kind of my resume. My experience of the Family Court. All right, so let me summarize. Summarize it real quick. You haven't had a trial, it's been nine years, you've had a lot of bad actors, which we all know, are part of the system to extract as much money out of you as possible. It's not going to be in everyone's case. But I think the majority of cases I've seen, this is what's going on, you figure out how to remove all of them. You had one thorn in your side, which was a bad judge, how long was that bad judge part of your case? Well, Mark, it's really good and important question.
My matter had been in front of one very corrupt judge for eight years, I did not know how to get rid of him. And the one 170.1 motion that I'm about to describe that I used with the new judge would not have worked once I had a judge on for many years, but we'll touch upon alternate

Sponsored by Kids Matter www.kidsmatter.charity donate to give kids a voice in divorce 

Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1

Contact Michael at www.judicialrevolution.u

Joining me is Ted Hildago. Very similar case to Jeffrey Younger, I think this one's actually more advanced. We want to get into the politics of transgender in divorce situations with kids when they're not a kid. That's a different story. But when they're kids, I find that parents are losing their rights.

Learn how this father lost the rights to his son after a judge (who didn't disclose that she had a transgender child) ruled against him

Judge Joni Hiramoto https://www.linkedin.com/in/joni-hiramoto-69755711/

Joining me is Ted Hildago. Very similar case to Jeffrey Younger, I think this one's actually more advanced. We want to get into the politics of transgender in divorce situations with kids when they're not a kid. That's a different story. But when they're kids, I find that parents are losing their rights.

Learn how this father lost the rights to his son after a judge (who didn't disclose that she had a transgender child) ruled against him

Judge Joni Hiramoto https://www.linkedin.com/in/joni-hiramoto-69755711/

Wait until you hear this international case of family court shenanigans. Grab your best headphones and take listen. 

Yeah, my name is Van Miller. I am by background. I'm a film and TV professional. I've produced television shows. And I also do investigative journalism on the side in order to expose the corruption of all kinds.

Well, you know, the family courts, you know, I just don't mince words with family court too much anymore, because, in my opinion, it's a wholly unlawful criminal operation that destroys families. I don't think there's anything lawful about the way things are done in family court. And one of my agendas is to not only bring attention to what's going on, and also to reform the family courts, because right now, as it stands, Family Court is nothing but a completely destructive operation that traumatizes children separates families. And it has to totally be in my opinion, it has to be not not just reformed, I mean, it has to be rebuilt from scratch, because it is a completely destructive operation, in my opinion.

Get ahold of Vem at   [email protected].

Guest William Dubree

Schedule a call with William: It's www.hopeindarkness.me/appointment.htm

Hello, everyone, welcome to divorce matters. Today, I have a very special guests. I know they're all special. But this is very unique, bangle, special, especially to anyone interested in parental alienation and how to, let's just say rget your kids back. And these guys have done some pretty amazing things. And we're gonna get into that in just a second. 

Dubree's Background: 

I've been in the field of experimental psychology for 50 years. I'm a specialist in the area of learning theory applications to human behavior. And I have been involved almost exclusively in working to create a solution that is the polar opposite of what is being done today, or last 40 years in the family courts to solve the issues of children who have been abused in such a way that they reject contact with another parent.

HTTP://www.kidsmatter.charity 
Support for this podcast comes from Kids Matter dot charity, a nonprofit dedicated to fighting for kids rights in difficult divorce situations donate at Kids Matter dot charity to help them restore common sense to the family courts. Thanks again for tuning in a reminder that we are not attorneys and this is not legal advice. We advise you do the research yourself or to contact an attorney trust. There are very few of them. This was divorce matters podcast

Does Civil Disobedience in Family Court work? 

Rob Emert did it - here's what happened 

Excerpt: "This is really what the very beginning where I really didn't know anything and I was just trying to get through the process and I was wishing that we could just you know of course have the whole divorce as be done and and I was making offers left and right but that again, that's here nor there at this point, but I was I just didn't realize I was walking into a mess. And I was walking into really when I look in retrospect, it was a sucker punch trap. And everybody knew that was going on in the divorce pretty much except me. And so back to you know, back to the peremptory challenge. So Commissioner comes in. We stipulate but then I talked to somebody at the facilitator's office, at the courthouse, and they told me basically look, you can still use your peremptory challenge because no orders were made. And so I found the peremptory challenge and this is warning bill number one, basically Commissioner Patty Radek, and even though I requested her to remove herself, using my peremptory challenge, she still stayed on the case. That you know, that was concerning right there. At that point, I didn't know that her supervising boss, her supervising judge was friends and work has worked with my ex wife for years. So again, I found that out much later..."

Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1
Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to HTTP://www.KidsMatter.charity