Alison Castro, University of Michigan
1h 29m
·
LSRI Speaker Series - Audio
·
Learning how to use mathematics curriculum materials effectively is arguably an important part of the work of teaching. Through my work on the BIFOCAL Project, a multi-year professional development project aimed at supporting middle school math teachers' use of curriculum materials, I began to think about the precise role that these materials play in the work of teaching, which led to my dissertation study. Briefly, the focus of my dissertation is an examination of how experienced middle school math teachers use the teacher guide from the Connected Mathematics Project (CMP) to inform their planning and instructional decisions around mathematical tasks. In addition to my experiences as a researcher, I have served as an instructor for mathematics methods and content courses for preservice elementary teachers. In regards to curriculum materials, little guidance and support is often provided for elementary preservice teachers in using math curriculum materials despite the prevalence of these materials in elementary classrooms. For this reason, I designed tasks and activities in my courses to help preservice teachers learn to use these materials effectively. In this talk, I will first describe my professional development work with inservice teachers in the BIFOCAL Project, and then talk at some length about my dissertation study, and finally move to discuss my research related to preservice elementary teachers' use of math curriculum materials in methods and content courses.
The episode Alison Castro, University of Michigan from the podcast LSRI Speaker Series - Audio has a duration of
1:29:58. It was first published
More episodes from LSRI Speaker Series - Audio
Mary Beth Rosson, Professor, Stanford University
Over the past 25 years, user interface designers and usability engineers have studied and refined human-computer interaction techniques with the goal of improving people’s productivity and experience. But the target of these efforts — the end user — is fast becoming a thing of the past. Many people now construct or extend software on their own, building artifacts that range from email filters to spreadsheet simulations to interactive web applications. These individuals are end user developers who build their own ad hoc solutions to everyday computing needs. Will end user developers help to resolve the software crisis? Given the right tools, people may be able to rapidly develop custom solutions to a range of context-specific computing requirements, eliminating the wait for IT professionals to analyze and engineer a solution. Or are these individuals a threat to our computing infrastructure? End user developers are informal programmers with no training in software construction methods or computing paradigms. They have little intrinsic motivation to test their products for even basic concerns like correctness or safety. In this talk I argue that the transformation of end user to end user developer is well underway and discuss the prospects for maximizing the benefits to society while addressing the risks.
Daniel Schwartz, Professor, Stanford University
Over the past years, we have been developing a computer learning technology called a Teachable Agent. The work leverages the common wisdom that people "really" learn when they have to teach. After a few years of positive results, we decided to get a better look at the mechanisms that drive learning in social interaction. Most cognitively inspired theories of learning point to the useful questions and ideas that arise in social interaction. But, can we really reduce the learning benefits of social interaction to a question of information flow? In this talk, I will present "laboratory" style data that tightly controls the types of information that arise in social interaction. I will show that learning from social interaction cannot be wholly ascribed to the different types of information that arise. For example, in a wizard of oz study, people thought they were interacting with a person or a computer, and information exchange was held constant across conditions. People learned more when they thought it was a person; people were more aroused when they thought it was a person; and finally level of arousal was correlated with learning.
Nathalie Sinclair, Professor, Simon Fraser University
I seek to establish insight into varieties of modeling that occur, recurrently, in students', teachers', and curriculum developers' experiences with The Geometer's Sketchpad. In this process, I attempt to contrast the conventional, practical sense of mathematical modeling-modeling of situations and phenomena to generate and predict plausible outcomes-to at least two other available forms or types of modeling practice, that I find especially relevant to mathematics education in their foundational didactic intent.
Nicholas Jackiw, Chief Technology Officer, KCP Technologies
In considering the geometric figure, Kant distinguishes between image--the traditional visual diagram--and schemata, the generalized concept of that diagram that "can never exist anywhere except in thought." Dynamic Geometry figures produced by software such as The Geometer's Sketchpad bridge this divide through flexible, "rubbery" diagrams that (under manipulation) transform into any valid realization of their defining geometric constraints, but at any instant retain the immediacy and tangibility of specific images. In this talk, Sketchpad's author explores the implications of Dynamic Geometry visualization on mathematical inquiry and pedagogic practice in the context of school (6-12) mathematics, and describes implementation concerns in the design and development of Dynamic Geometry software.
Melanie Cooper, Professor, Clemson University
Problem solving is one of the most important goals of any science course. However it is notoriously difficult to improve students’ problem solving abilities, and many students never develop competence. This is particularly true for open-ended or case-based problems – which are also more difficult to assess. We use a number of methods including a suite of software tools and inventories that allow us to assess both student problem solving strategy, student ability, and metacognitive activity as they change over time. Using these tools we can predict how a student will perform on subsequent problems with a 90% probability. Now that we have a set of fairly robust assessment materials, we have begun to develop and investigate intervention methods designed to improve student problem solving strategies and abilities. These methods include collaborative grouping, metacognitive strategies, laboratory projects, and concept maps. The effects of these interventions will be discussed, with regard to student ability, developmental level, and gender.