READING DIFFERENT STANDPOINTS AND EFFECTIVELY ARGUING OUR FAVORED STANDPOINT?
6m
·
THOSE AFTER ME
·
This episode hits on how Zarefsky and Bitzer discuss their perspectives on distinctions logic from irrational/impulsive thought to effectively get points or favored standpoints across
The episode READING DIFFERENT STANDPOINTS AND EFFECTIVELY ARGUING OUR FAVORED STANDPOINT? from the podcast THOSE AFTER ME has a duration of
6:21. It was first published
More episodes from THOSE AFTER ME
READING DIFFERENT STANDPOINTS AND EFFECTIVELY ARGUING OUR FAVORED STANDPOINT?
This episode hits on how Zarefsky and Bitzer discuss their perspectives on distinctions logic from irrational/impulsive thought to effectively get points or favored standpoints across