Professor Todd Haugh on the Southern District of New York’s Whistleblower Pilot Program [Podcast]
15m
·
Compliance Perspectives
·
By Adam Turteltaub In January 2024 the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) set a shockwave through the business world by announcing a new whistleblower pilot program. To understand what the policy says and what it likely means for compliance programs, we spoke with Todd Haugh (LinkedIn), Associate Professor of Business Law and Ethics, Arthur M. Weimer Faculty Fellow in Business Law at the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University. Under the policy, he explains, individuals who have participated in a fraud may be eligible for a non-prosecution agreement, if the individual meets three key criteria: They provide information that is not previously known to prosecutors and is produced voluntarily, not subsequent, say, to an arrest. The information is full, substantial and truthful. The individual is not otherwise disqualified, such as serving as a government official or the CEO or CFO of the company. Given the incentives already in place for companies to self-report wrongdoing, this is in many ways an extension of what already exists. However, it’s impact should not be underplayed. The SDNY is a leader in white collar prosecutions and other US Attorney’s offices are likely to follow suit. At least one already has. Second, while the SEC has encouraged whistleblowing at publicly traded policies, the SDNY policy is open to public, private and even non-profit organizations. The new policy also may create situations in which employees and their employers find themselves in a race to disclose first. This, in turn, means that organizations need to significantly increase their efforts to create a culture that encourages internal whistleblowing. That includes creating easy paths to follow for potential whistleblowers and prompt investigations. Listen in to learn more about the policy and how your compliance program may need to evolve as a result of it.
The episode Professor Todd Haugh on the Southern District of New York’s Whistleblower Pilot Program [Podcast] from the podcast Compliance Perspectives has a duration of
15:28. It was first published
More episodes from Compliance Perspectives
Mel Blackmore on ISO 27001 [Podcast]
By Adam Turteltaub ISO 27001 is the leading standard for information security management systems. As Mel Blackmore, CEO of UK-based Blackmores explains, it is a framework that applies and is of value regardless of an organization’s size, sector or country. Organizations seek ISO 27001 certification to ensure that their IT security reflects best practices. It also brings to organizations a systematic approach to work in this area. In addition, potential business partners will have greater confidence that your organization has robust data defenses. Most organizations have a head start when it comes to becoming ISO 27001 certified. Many existing IT security practices are likely to be consistent standards. To get the rest of the way to certification, she outlines several steps including: Determine where your organization is already compliant Conduct a gap analysis Performing a risk assessment Creating policies and procedures Listen in to learn more about meeting this important ISO standard and what it will take to maintain certification.
Renee Murphy on ESG and Compliance [Podcast]
By Adam Turteltaub What do we do with ESG? Is it a part of compliance? Something different? How do we handle it? Renee Murphy, Distinguished Evangelist at Diligent argues in this podcast that while there are compliance aspects to ESG, it is best to quickly make it a part of operations and under the general risk management structure. Of the three elements of ESG, it is the environmental sustainability side, she believes, that will be the most challenging. With new requirements for organizations to report on their fossil footprint, companies are being forced to march into unexplored territory. As a result, they will need to evolve their process, which, she believes, will become easier as management comes to understand the balance sheet implications. Listen in to learn more about what is happening with ESG, and what compliance teams need to know.
Ronald Chapman II on Healthcare Enforcement Trends [Podcast]
By Adam Turteltaub Healthcare enforcement is never quiet. There’s always something, or many things, going on, and compliance teams need to stay on top of the trends to ensure that their programs are staying ahead of the risks. To find out where things are today, we spoke with Ronald Chapman II, author of the book Unraveling Federal Investigations, defense attorney with Chapman Law Group and president of Chapman Consulting Group. In this podcast he identifies several areas of intense enforcement activity: Drug testing labs are under scrutiny, particularly around the number of panels and reflex testing Telemedicine continues to be a hot area as well Venture capital firms are entering healthcare and/or deepening their investment, often with complex payment arrangements and without sufficient antikickback review Aggressive telemarking in the durable medical equipment space persists Credentialing issues, especially for smaller entities, are resulting in non-payments and fraud allegations On the criminal side, he notes that controlled substance prescribing is in prosecutors’ eyes, often coupling these cases with fraud charges, leading to a one-two punch. Listen in to learn more about what healthcare enforcement authorities are doing and how to strengthen your compliance efforts.
Chris Audet on Whether Culture is Truly That Important [Podcast]
By Adam Turteltaub Creating the right corporate culture is an idea that’s sacrosanct in the field of compliance and ethics. The folks at Gartner, though, are challenging that belief. In this podcast Chris Audet, Vice President and Chief of Research for General Counsels and Chief Compliance Officers, tells us that their newly released report finds that focusing on key quality measures in the compliance program may be more important. The firm reached the conclusion after surveying over 1000 employees about the situations that lead to employee noncompliance. To quote from the press release, “In the survey, 87% of respondents said they faced situations where they didn’t know how to comply in the last 12 months, followed by 77% of respondents who experienced situations of rationalization and 40% experiencing situations of malice.” Improved quality standards – the design and accessibility of policies, training and so forth – had much more of an effect on reducing uncertainty than culture did. As he notes, when employees are faced with uncertainty, the key thing is to have easily accessible policies and a workforce that knows where to find them. Most troubling, of course, is the reportedly high temptation, not always acted on, to be noncompliant for malicious reasons. Listen in to learn more about the challenges of malice and rationalization and how quality standards may help there as well.
Adam Greene on State Privacy Laws [Podcast]
By Adam Turteltaub There’s no General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the US. Absent a comprehensive, national privacy law, states have stepped in to fill the gap. As Adam Greene (LinkedIn), Partner at Davis Wright Tremaine explains in this podcast, that’s creating some complications. The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) already differs from subsequent laws in several states which use language reminiscent of the GDPR. And while there are many similarities, some differences are substantial. For example, some state laws are targeted at businesses, not non-profits. That’s an important distinction for healthcare with so many non-profit institutions. Perhaps the greatest challenge for organizations is figuring out which standard to follow, if any. Do they take a state-by-state approach, or one national approach based on the toughest state laws? Whatever the choice, it’s important to determine what data you have since there may be limits on collection and a requirement to share that data with consumers who want to see it. Listen in to learn more about what the states are requiring and what you need to do to meet their expectations.